Water Pass
[caption id="attachment_693" align="alignnone" width="600" caption="Glendale's Manuk Hakobyan throws a pass over Arcadia's Andrew Byrne on Tuesday, October 5, 2009. (Roger Wilson/News-Press)"]
[/caption]
[/caption]
Football watchers may have noticed professional players sporting pink wristbands, hats and football cleats over the weekend, part of the NFL's efforts to boost awareness for breast cancer screenings and prevention. 
A flock of animal-rights activists dressed as chickens descended on NBC Studios Tuesday to shame Jay Leno into dropping McDonald’s from a planned promotion.
Flapping their wings and hoisting signs that read “McDonald’s: Nothing But Cruelty,” and “McCruelty: I’m Hatin’ It,” protesters with the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals lined a stretch of Bob Hope Drive as “The Jay Leno Show” prepared to unveil a promotion for McDonald’s Monopoly contest.
Full story here.
[/caption]
[/caption]
One of the first things I did when I started at the News-Press was get a Glendale Public Libraries card. Today after work, I plan to make my way down Brand Boulevard to Central Library to pick up a copy of "Shanghai Girl," which I have on hold.
In case you haven't heard, "Shanghai Girls" is this year's selection for the Own Book One Glendale program, where residents are encouraged to all read the same book and then discuss it.
I've decided to take part, and I am quite excited to dive into the book, which has topped most of the national bestseller's lists this summer.
When I'm done, I'll let you all know what I think. If you've read it, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
[/caption]
As journalists, we see a whole lot of things. We don't share all of them.
Sometimes we don't tell you about them because we've promised not to -- the famed "off the record" comment is a prime reason why. Sometimes we know details that may put someone's life in danger, such as the home address of a gang informant or undercover police officer. And sometimes, a fact is so nasty that it fails "The Cheerios Test." That is, if a detail would likely make a reader urp up his or her breakfast, it would deem to not pass the test.
Nasty facts are part of life, to be sure. And, as some of you have noted in letters and e-mails, we do not generally shy away from graphic details. To me, the reason to omit a graphic detail is not simply that it is nasty, but nasty AND unnecessary. Let me give you a good example:
A few weeks ago, we reported on the story of John Levin, who is accused of murdering his wife, Michelle. Levin, who was arrested Sept. 11 at the Canadian border, is currently awaiting extradition from Washington State. The decomposed bodies of his wife and the couple's dog were found in their apartment near North Central Avenue in Glendale.
In addition to murder charges, Levin is also facing animal cruelty charges for allegedly killing the pooch via microwave. I decided against putting that detail in the original story, as I felt it was (a) nasty and (b) irrelevant.
This fact became pertinent in our follow-up story, however, when we discovered that Levin, a former member of the Montrose Search and Rescue Team, once helped save a former mayor's dog. That is, while the details remained nasty, they became relevant to readers' understanding of what had allegedly occurred.